JohnQuixote
Friday, Dec 14 2007, 12:17 AM
QUOTE (RickyCe @ Thursday, Dec 13 2007, 11:24 PM)

min 1.25 ct
min G
min VS1 (willing to go VS2)
GIA or AGS only
best possible in symmetry and polish
pointed and no FL
table and depth vary on princess or round
You're doing great. You have a good basic grasp and a fine target plan. Technically princess cuts can have great have brightness and fire too, they just don't have the vivid on-off flashes rounds have. It's a difference in contrast pattern; fancy shapes rely on motion more than rounds do and because of greater variability in faceting there is a wider range of 'looks' in fancies (example; the choice of 2,3,4 or 5 chevron pavilion faceting in princess will alter the size of the scintillation events relative to stone size).
I'm a fan of AGS grading as a benchmark. The AGS0 is especially useful in princess shapes, first because the extra time and effort it takes manufacturers to cut to AGS0 standards is resulting in some dynamite, upper-echelon stones, and second bacause when you're seeking a princess online the numbers can't lead to meaningful predictions in the same way they can with rounds.
So you know, blue fluorescence is not really an issue, particularly when medium or lower - you won't notice its presence unless you're under blacklight. It can actually help the face-up appearance of near-colorless stones. Check this GIA study, the pdf is linked at the bottom. The second paragraph on this page is a good sumup:
http://www.gia.edu/gemsandgemology/18578/1...icle_detail.cfmSounds like you've done good homework so far.